BEST LINKS

The path to football wisdom winds through scheduling puzzles - will the ACC choose eight games or nine? The answer lies within the debate ahead. Pete Thamel breaks it down here.

A coaching legend's journey reaches its final chapter - the basketball world mourns the loss of George Henry Raveling, whose impact extended far beyond the court. Link

By the numbers: Why Bill Belichick's UNC debut was a disaster for the ages at North Carolina. LINK

DEEP DIVE

The Pressure Cooker: College Football's Most Scrutinized Coaches

Week 1 separated the coaches who know how to survive from those learning what real pressure feels like. Here are the nine coaches under the most pressure after one game.

1. Louisiana Tech's Coach Has A 7-17 Record But Still Has His Job. Here's The Survival Strategy That's Keeping Him Employed

Sonny Cumbie sits atop the hot seat rankings not because he's the worst coach in college football, but because he's mastered the art of doing just enough to survive another week.

The Numbers Tell a Brutal Story

Louisiana Tech fans have watched their program spiral under Cumbie's leadership:

• 7-17 overall record across two seasons

• 3-9 in 2023, followed by 4-8 in 2024

• Fan expectations dropped to rock bottom

• Still failing to meet even those lowered standards

Week 1: The Perfect Example

Cumbie's 24-0 shutout victory over Southeastern Louisiana perfectly encapsulates his tenure.

What happened:

• Beat an FCS opponent convincingly

• Defense forced 3 turnovers and looked competent

• Executed cleanly without major mistakes

What it really means:

• Did exactly what any Power 5 program should do

• Bought himself another week of job security

• Reinforced his pattern of bare minimum achievement

The Cumbie Formula

Here's why he holds the top spot: Cumbie has perfected the survival strategy of college coaching.

He delivers just enough positive moments to avoid immediate termination while never showing enough sustained improvement to build genuine job security. It's coaching limbo at its finest.

The result?

A coach perpetually coaching for his job, a fanbase with zero enthusiasm, and a program stuck in neutral.

Cumbie doesn't hold the #1 hot seat because he's incompetent.

He holds it because he's competent enough to keep failing upward.

2. Cincinnati Threw For 69 Yards In Week 1. Here's Why Coach Satterfield Trails The #1 Hot Seat By Just 0.001 Points

What Separates #2 From #1

Satterfield trails Cumbie by just 0.001 in hot-seat rating, but the gap in pressure probability might be even smaller.

The key difference:

• Cumbie did the bare minimum and survived another week

• Satterfield failed when failure wasn't an option

• Cincinnati fans expected competence, not miracles

The Offensive Coordinator Question

When your quarterback throws for 69 yards in a season opener, someone has to take the blame.

The rushing attack produced 202 yards and kept the game competitive, proving the talent exists. But questionable offensive coordinator decisions amplified an already dire quarterback situation.

Why He's Actually Closer to #1

Here's what the rankings don't capture: Satterfield might have a higher actual firing probability than Cumbie.

Louisiana Tech fans have given up. Cincinnati fans still have expectations.

The math is simple: Disappointed expectations create more heat than met low expectations.

One more loss like Nebraska, and that 0.001 gap disappears entirely

3. Akron's Coach Has Had 4 Years To Build A Program. Instead, He Just Got Shut Out At Home And Proved Statistical Improvement Is Meaningless

When Four Years of "Progress" Leads to Getting Shutout at Home

Joe Moorhead has perfected something no coach wants to master: the statistical improvement art form of losing.

His Week 1 shutout loss to Wyoming proved that all those marginal gains mean nothing when you can't score a single point.

The Moorhead Paradox

Four years into his Akron tenure, Moorhead sits at 8-30 overall with a 0.642 hot seat rating that reflects serious trouble.

The numbers that matter:

• Shutout at home by Wyoming 10-0

• QB Ben Finley: 16/38, 139 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT (42.1% completion)

• Complete offensive failure: 228 total yards, zero points

• Lost a "winnable" game that could have bought him breathing room

Year 4 With Zero Progress

Here's what makes Moorhead's situation particularly brutal: he's had time to build something, and this is what he built.

The reality check:

• Every pessimistic preseason prediction was validated immediately

• Fan concerns proved justified in the most painful way possible

• No positives emerged from a game that should have been competitive

The Art Form of Losing

Moorhead has mastered the cruelest type of coaching failure.

He shows just enough statistical improvement to suggest progress while delivering results that prove the opposite. Yards gained, completion percentages, defensive stops, all the metrics that don't matter when you're getting shut out at home.

The bottom line:

Statistical improvement without wins is just organized failure.

After four years and 30 losses, Moorhead has proven he can make losing look scientific.

4. UAB Beat Alabama State 52-42 In Week 1. Here's Why Needing 52 Points To Beat An FCS Team Made Coach Dilfer's Hot Seat Even Warmer

Trent Dilfer's UAB Blazers beat Alabama State 52-42 in Week 1, and somehow that victory made his hot seat even warmer.

When you need 52 points to beat an FCS team, you haven't solved your problems.

Year 3: Put Up or Shut Up Time

Dilfer enters his third season with a 7-18 record and zero margin for error.

The brutal math:

• UAB fans expected progress, not FCS shootouts

• Gave up 42 points to a team that shouldn't score 20

• "Hail Mary" roster overhaul failed spectacularly on defense

• Pattern established: explosive offense, nonexistent defense

Defensive Malpractice

Here's what makes Dilfer's situation uniquely frustrating: the offense works.

The positives were real:

• 520 total yards of offense

• Jalen Kitna looked capable at quarterback

• Zero turnovers showed improved ball security

The problem is everything else.

No amount of offensive firepower can mask giving up 42 points to Alabama State. That's not a competitive game; it's defensive malpractice.

The 2025 Reality Check

Despite staff changes and roster additions, there's no hope for defensive improvement.

When your "successful" season opener requires 52 points to beat FCS competition, you've proven that fundamental problems remain unfixed after two full seasons.

The writing is on the wall:

Dilfer can coach offense, but he can't coach defense.

In college football, that's not a recipe for job security; it's a recipe for 2025 being your last season.

5. Oklahoma Crushed Illinois State 35-3 In Week 1. Here's Why Coach Venables Is Still Holding His Breath At A Program That Demands Perfection

Brent Venables crushed Illinois State 35-3 in Week 1, and Oklahoma fans are still holding their breath.

When you coach at a program with championship expectations, even dominant wins against FCS teams feel like pop quizzes.

The Weight of Following Legends

Year 3 at Oklahoma carries different pressure than Year 3 anywhere else.

The reality of the situation:

• Following Bob Stoops and Lincoln Riley's championship legacy

• 6-7 in 2024 was entirely unacceptable for the fanbase

• Championship or bust mentality hasn't changed with the coaching staff

• Oklahoma's outsized expectations demand immediate results

Week 1: Doing What Was Required

The Illinois State beatdown showed flashes of what Venables is building.

What went right:

• QB John Mateer looked transformed: 30/37, 392 yards, 3 TD (81.1%)

• Ben Arbuckle hire shows immediate offensive promise

• Defensive dominance against overmatched competition

• Only 2 turnovers showed improved ball security

The Real Tests Are Coming

Here's why Venables sits at #5 despite the impressive opener: Oklahoma fans have seen this movie before.

Beating FCS teams is the minimum requirement. The objective evaluation comes against Michigan and throughout the brutal SEC schedule that awaits.

The Oklahoma standard: Championships, not moral victories.

The Venables challenge: Prove that Year 3 is when everything clicks, not when the seat gets hottest.

Venables did what was required in Week 1.

Now comes the part where Oklahoma coaches either become legends or become former coaches of the University of Oklahoma.

Others We're Watching: 4 Coaches Who Earned Our Attention After Week 1

Kalen Deboer Lost To An Unranked Team In Week 1. Here's Why Following Nick Saban Means Every Loss Is A Crisis

Kalen DeBoer just experienced the fastest hot seat elevation in college football history.

Alabama’s Week 1 loss to unranked Florida State launched him from #85 to #7, proving that coaching at Alabama means living in a different reality than everyone else.

The Saban Shadow Effect

Year 2 following a legend creates impossible pressure, but Year 2 following Nick Saban at Alabama creates something beyond pressure.

The brutal math:

• Lost 31-17 to unranked Florida State as the #8-ranked team

• Alabama fans expect championships, not losses to unranked opponents

• Institutional panic creates immediate crisis mode

• "Bama fans want a pound of flesh" after this type of performance

What Went Wrong

The loss wasn't just disappointing; it was a comprehensive failure on both sides of the ball.

The breakdown:

• Offensive struggles: 341 yards produced only 17 points

• Defense gave up 382 yards to FSU's offense

• No turnovers created or lost, meaning execution was the problem

• Year 2 means no excuses, period

The Alabama Standard

Here's what makes DeBoer's situation unique: he has Alabama's resources, Alabama's talent, and Alabama's expectations.

At most schools, a Week 1 loss is a learning experience. At Alabama, it's a referendum on whether you belong.

The reality of coaching at Alabama: One bad game doesn't erase everything, but one bad game can define everything.

DeBoer learned that Alabama doesn't grade on curves.

They grade on championships, and losing to unranked teams in Week 1 isn't championship behavior.

Boise State Was Ranked #25 And Had 378 Yards Of Offense. They Still Lost 34-7 To An Unranked Team, And Here's Why That Makes No Mathematical Sense

Spencer Danielson was flying under the radar at #37 on the hot seat rankings.

Then #25 Boise State lost 34-7 to unranked South Florida, and suddenly everyone's paying attention.

The Complete Statistical Disaster

This wasn't just a bad loss; it was a comprehensive coaching failure on every level.

The brutal breakdown:

• 27-point blowout on the road, never competitive

• 378 total yards, but only 7 points scored

• 3 turnovers (all fumbles), showing a lack of discipline

• 0.018 points per yard (the math of red zone disasters)

When Fan Concerns Become Prophetic

Here's what makes this loss particularly damaging: Boise State fans saw this coming.

The validation nobody wanted:

• Fan unrest at the end of the 2024 season now looks completely justified

• Week 1 disaster against inferior competition exposed fundamental problems

• Road game execution revealed coaching and preparation issues

• Statistical anomaly (378 yards, 7 points) suggests systemic failures

Why This Is Worse Than Other Week 1 Disasters

Danielson's blowout loss stands out even among a week full of coaching failures.

The comparison test:

• Worse than Moorhead's shutout (at least Akron kept it close)

• Worse than Satterfield's loss (Cincinnati lost close to a P5 team)

• Worse than DeBoer's defeat (Alabama lost to a quality FSU program)

• Danielson had a ranked team blown out by G5 competition

The Under-the-Radar Philosophy in Action

This is precisely why early hot seat identification matters.

The pattern recognition: Fan concerns emerge before mainstream media notices, Week 1 performance validates those warning signs, and situations escalate quickly when ignored.

Danielson just moved from "under the radar" to "immediate crisis" in one game.

Boise State fans tried to warn everyone.

Now everyone else will finally listen.

Baylor Lost 38-24 To A 5-7 Auburn Team In Week 1. Here's Why Coach Aranda Got Out-Coached By Someone Under More Pressure Than Him

Dave Aranda moves from #34 to #17 on the hot seat rankings, but his 38-24 loss to Auburn reveals why he belongs much higher.

When you lose to Hugh Freeze, who was ranked #6 at the time, you haven't just lost a game; you've lost credibility.

The Numbers That Tell the Real Story

Baylor's loss to Auburn wasn't just disappointing; it was a masterclass in regression.

What went wrong:

• Allowed 307 rushing yards when Auburn averaged only 165.5/game in 2024

• Managed only 64 rushing yards when Baylor averaged 178.8/game last season

• Lost to a 5-7 Auburn team that wasn't supposed to be good

• Failed to exploit Auburn's poor 2024 rushing defense

Context Makes Everything Worse

Here's what elevates this from bad loss to inexcusable failure: Aranda got out-coached by a coach who was coaching for his job.

The brutal reality:

• Hugh Freeze was ranked 28 spots higher on the hot seat

• Auburn went 5-7 in 2024. This wasn't a quality opponent

• Year 3 expectations meant Baylor fans expected progress, not regression

• Known weaknesses in Auburn's defense went unexploited

Why Aranda’s Ranking Should Jump

Losing happens in college football.

Getting dominated by a coach who's in more trouble than you doesn't.

The movement case: When the coach ranked #6 on the hot seat out-prepares and out-executes the coach ranked #34, something is fundamentally wrong with the rankings.

Aranda didn't just lose to Auburn.

He lost to a coach who had way more pressure and still found a way to make Baylor look unprepared on both sides of the ball.

UCLA's Coach Banned Media From Practice For 8 Months. Then His Team Got Blown Out 43-10 At Home And Proved Paranoia Doesn't Equal Preparation

Deshaun Foster spent eight months building walls around his program.

Then UCLA got blown out 43-10 at home by Utah, and those walls became a spotlight on his failure.

The Paranoia Strategy

Foster's high-risk gamble was designed to eliminate distractions after a disappointing 5-7 debut season.

The protective approach:

• Shut out the media from practices and player access

• Tighter restrictions on all team interactions

• "Some might call it paranoia," a defensive mentality

• Goal: Block outside noise and create focus

The catastrophic result: UCLA looked like they had never prepared for anything.

The Complete Statistical Meltdown

This wasn't just a loss; it was a comprehensive demonstration that secrecy doesn't create readiness.

The tissue-soft performance:

• 43-10 blowout margin in their own building

• 220 total yards vs Utah's 492 yards

• 50% completion rate with only 136 passing yards

• 3.0 yards per carry rushing attack

• "UCLA's lines were destroyed" on both sides

The team that was supposed to be laser-focused looked completely unprepared when the lights came on.

Why Year 2 Makes This Inexcusable

Foster's situation jumped from #48 to #15 on the hot seat rankings because context matters.

The expectation reality:

• Year 1 struggles were excusable as transition growing pains

• Year 2 in the Big Ten demanded visible improvement

• Same fundamental problems with no progress visible

• UCLA relevance requires better than getting rag-dolled at home

The Media Strategy Backfire Effect

Here's the brutal irony: Foster's media restrictions only work if you deliver results.

When you get blown out, the strategy amplifies the disaster.

The amplification problem: The Media will have a field day after being shut out all season. The team looked unfocused, despite months of "protection," and paranoia highlighted the failure instead of preventing it.

Foster played high-stakes poker with UCLA's credibility.

He lost big, and now everyone's watching him try to rescue himself from a disaster of his own making.

Complete Rankings

Check and see where your coach is on our week 2 list, available HERE.

THAT’S A WRAP

Week 1 taught us that pressure in college football isn't just about losing—it's about context.

Sonny Cumbie keeps his job by doing the absolute minimum. Kalen DeBoer loses his honeymoon period with one bad game. Spencer Danielson turns 378 yards into 7 points and creates a crisis. Deshaun Foster discovers that building walls around your program only works if you can actually coach.

The math is simple: expectations plus performance equals pressure.

Some coaches thrive under scrutiny. Others crumble when the spotlight finds them. Week 1 was just the audition—now comes the real test.

Coming Up This Week

Friday: Weekend Preview Which games will separate the survivors from the pretenders? We'll break down the matchups that could shake up our pressure rankings and identify the coaches who can't afford another stumble.

Tuesday: Week 2 Hot Seat Rankings After two games, the pressure picture gets clearer. Who moved up after another disappointing performance? Which coaches bought themselves breathing room? And who just discovered that Week 1 wasn't a fluke—it was a preview.

The season is young, but the pressure never stops building.

Stay tuned. The heat is just getting started.